Anti-Judaism and the Council of
Nicea Richard ‘Aharon’ Chaimberlin, Litt.D. |
THE COUNCIL OF NICEA was convened in 325
CE[1] (AD) by
Constantine, Emperor of the
Throughout
his reign,
I |
SRAEL rose up against the Roman occupiers in 68 CE, a war
in which the Beit HaMikdash
(
Because of a high birth rate and an
undying hatred of the Romans,
The final and utter defeat of Israel of
Israel was seen by many Christians as a sign that
By the time
Although Passover was still celebrated
by the Gentile Christian church, the Gentiles began to see a need to
differentiate “their” Passover from the “Jewish” Passover. The bishops at Nicea
decided to move the Christian celebration of Passover to the first Sunday after
the Jewish Passover, which always falls on the 14th of Abib (Nisan), which can fall on any day of the week.
Centuries later, the very name Passover (or Pesach) became distasteful
to the Gentile church, and the term “Easter” (from the pagan goddess Ishtar) was adopted in place of Passove.
In addition, the calendar was finally manipulated to remove any direct connection
with the celebration of the Jewish Passover. In 1989, for instance, the
“Christian” observance of Easter was almost a month before Passover.
The first edict in favor of the
“Venerable Day of the Sun” (Sunday) was made at this Council. Although some
Christians had begun observing Sun Day before Nicea, most Christians generally
observed the seventh day Sabbath according to the Biblical commandment before
Nicea.
It was also at the Council of Nicea
that the standard creed for the Trinity was formulated, consisting of belief in
a Three-Person Godhead, co-equal, co-eternal, and co-substantial (of the same
substance). Belief in the Trinity became mandatory, and those who did not hold
to the belief in Trinity as constituted by Nicea were subject to tremendous
persecution. Hundreds of thousands, if not millions, were murdered by the
“Church” after Nicea for not holding to this doctrine. In large part, Nicea was
the genuine “birthplace” of the Catholic Church, the direct result of the
marriage of Church and State.
Civil
legislation enforced the decrees of the Council of Nicea. This was a victory of
civil legislation over truth by civil legislation.
The churches which flourished in
worldly wealth were the primary churches represented by this Council. The poor
and humble churches could not afford to send representatives over a thousand
miles away. The Catholic Encyclopedia says, “Some bishops,
blinded by the splendor of the court, went so far as to laud the emperor as an
angel of God, as a sacred being, and to prophesy that he would, like the Son of
God, reign in heaven.” [4]
Nicea, with its theological anti-Judaism, laid the foundation for the anti-Semitic legislation and judgments of later church councils. The Council of Antioch (341 CE) prohibited Christians from celebrating Passover with the Jews. The Council of Laodicea in the same century forbade Christians from observing the Jewish (and biblical) Sabbath. (Prior to this time, Christianity was somewhat divided, with some Christians observing the Sabbath, some observing Sunday, and some observing both!) Christians were also forbidden from receiving gifts from Jews or matzo[5] from Jewish festivals as well as other “impieties.” [6]
It wasn’t all bad news in those early centuries; Judaism was not a “prohibited sect,” according to the Codex Theodosianus of 438 CE. Rabbis were entitled to the same privileges as the Christian clergy. Jews were not to be disturbed on their Sabbath or Feast Days. Their synagogues were not to be attacked, violated, burned, or confiscated. However, conversion was a one-way street. Jews could convert to Christianity, and were encouraged to do so. However, Christians were forbidden to convert to Judaism. Also, Jews were forbidden to have Christian slaves, but Christians could own Jewish slaves. Christians were forbidden under penalty of death to marry Jews. (This was kind of a blessing for the Jews, who didn’t have to worry about intermarriage decimating the ranks of the Jews as we see happening today.) Jewish tribunals were considered valid only in matters purely religious. The Fiscus Judaicus (Jewish tax) from earlier centuries was maintained, a tax which only Jews were required to pay to government authorities.
The few protections offered by the Codex Judaicus were relatively short-lived. It wasn’t many decades until attacks on Jews and their synagogues became commonplace. The Jew was a second-class citizen, somewhat protected by law, but merely tolerated, something akin to the dhimmi status that is given to non-Muslims in Islamic countries. However, these were the “good old days” compared to the horrors that would be inflicted upon the Jews in later centuries by the “Church triumphant.” Rav Shaul (Paul) commanded Christian gentiles to “provoke the Jews to jealousy” with their righteous living. Christians did end up provoking the Jews, so they got it half right.
Considering the rampant anti-Semitism at the Council of Nicea, I am both surprised and disappointed when I see even Messianic Jews quote decisions from the Council of Nicea in support of certain theologies and creeds. The Council of Nicea (the first genuinely Roman Catholic council) was very creedal oriented. Creeds (what you believe) is far more important than what you do. In Judaism, observance of the mitzvoth (commandments) is the litmus test of being a good Jew. Little emphasis is placed upon creeds.
The emphasis upon creeds in the Christian church resulted in the deaths of millions of martyrs and “heretics.” Christian love and charity were sorely lacking, even to other Christians. In fact, a Jew usually had a far better chance of surviving than a Christian who was deemed to be a heretic.
I am grateful to live in a society in which honest differences of opinion can exist. Yeshua said, “This is my commandment, that you love one another.” [7] This is far more important than any creed formulated by any church council.
I would like to conclude with the following comments: There is a world of difference between the genuine followers of Yeshua and the pretenders. We highly esteem genuine Christians who are truly born-again of the Ruakh (Spirit) of God. We do not intend to slander the true disciples of Yeshua, whether they be Jews or Gentiles.
[1] “Common
Era.”
[2] I am using the term
“Christian” loosely. A genuine disciple of Yeshua would never commit these
crimes against others.
[3]
[4] Vol. 4, “
[5] “Unleavened
bread.”
[6] Apostolic Fathers,
p. 357.
[7] Yochanan (John) 15:12.